"We don't know who's guilty"


Just recent there was a news post that made me "smile", not because i was happy about the post, but because people start to open their eyes and starts to ask questions.
Here's the link: http://www.dagbladet.no/2013/08/28/nyheter/innenriks/syria/fn/usa/28944569/

I want to tell you a story, a real story.
It was on tuesday, I was taking the subway, I was on my way to a park, we were going to BBQ. I went with some family members, a man from Iraq walked towards us, he asked us where we came from, and we told him. (Im not going to tell you where i come from to remain anonym.) any way, he then said almost yelling ".....is a good, your country fucked america, america kill children, they've killed children in your country" he also said repedeatly "america killed children in Iraq, america killed my daughter" He was screaming, his face was red and tears were running down his face. He also screamed "fuck america, fuck america, they kill children". etc. People that were sitting in the subway just watched him, they looked down on him, after some guards (vektere) esqorted him out.

I felt so sorry for him, his daughter got killed, he couldn't do anything, he can't do anything to get justice, because americas war handlings will never see the light ever again, it's hidden...uncept someone release them like edward snowden.

Now do we really believe that it was the government in syria uses chemical weapons?! After everything? Ofcourse not!
We have seen so many examples, videos showing what the army have done, showing how the media makes up bullshitt etc.

Come on people start using some sense and start asking some question.

This post is not done, there will be more comming after each time something new happens.

The text under is from the Norwegian newspaper called dagbladet. Here's the link:http://www.dagbladet.no/2013/08/30/nyheter/utenriks/syria/28974563/

All indications now that a U.S. attack on Syria could come as soon as the UN weapons inspectors out of the country , writes New York Times.
According to the prestigious American newspaper is President Barack Obama prepared to launch a military attack alone, and without the approval of the UN Security Council .

War Crime

Several leaders today gave support to plans for a criminal action against Syria , after gas attack that both Obama and British Prime Minister David Cameron is absolutely convinced initiated by the Syrian regime.

Hundreds were killed in the brutal attack against Zamalka near the Syrian capital Damascus on 21 August .

"It 's about large-scale use of chemical weapons , and our response to a war crime - nothing else ," Cameron said in Parliament today .

He was concerned that the gas attack was a kind of trial balloon from Bashar al - Assad , but did not get parliamentary support for his desire for a military attack.

(Commentary: It's bullshitt, Obama gave the order of gas attack.)

Limited attacks

A meeting of the Security Council who only recently ended , ended by the Huffington Post without signs agreement on Syria crisis.But according to the New York Times to U.S. President believe that a consensus in the Security Council nor necessary.

This paper is based on interviews with senior officials in the Obama administration.According to these officials want U.S. intelligence material to be presented tonight to show that forces loyal to Syrian President Bashar al - Assad was responsible for the gas attack on the outskirts of Damascus.

(Commentary:Obama administration... do I need to say more?)

Although not al - Assad can be linked directly to the attack , according to the administration that the evidence is sufficient for a limited attack to intimidate Syria's government from using such weapons again .

USA - operation

Obama's advisers do not believe any approval of military action will come in the Security Council , because it is blocked by Russia.

Because the use of chemical weapons is internationally banned and because Obama would protect U.S. allies Turkey, Jordan and Israel against the use of such weapons , he and his administration that this is not necessary to justify a limited military action .

Obama should have " made ​​it clear that the initiative here will come from the U.S., and while he would welcome international participation depends not he the involvement of foreign forces for what essentially will be an operation conducted by the United States ," writes the New York Times.

Meanwhile, the newspaper sources have talked to it is clear that it is not taken any decision to attack Syria.

- DO NOT ATTACK SYRIA: British protesters gathered outside Parliament today. There, Prime Minister David Cameron's proposal for military intervention in Syria rejected. Photo: AFP PHOTO / ANDREW COWIE / NTB SCANPIX

Link to the newspost:http://www.dagbladet.no/2013/08/30/nyheter/meninger/kommentar/utenriks/politikk/28967931/

Obama, Cameron and Hollande :

They stumble on a war footing

Suddenly it wasn't urgent to attack Syria to Barack Obama, David Cameron and Franois Holland . And late in the evening on Thursday , it went completely wrong for Cameron when the Parlament voted down his plan to attack Syria.

They had rushed out, and too much got in the way , both here and there. The heads of the three Western powers , two of them old , who have permanent seats on the Security Council of the UN, had to abruptly pull in years and think. The waters until Syria proved politically perilous .

In France, President Franois Hollande spoke noticeably more moderate than Tuesday, when he was " ready to punish those who have taken the shameful decision to gander innocent ." Thursday , he talked about finding other ways out than a military attack . " Everything must be done for a political solution ," said Hollande after a meeting with the head of Syria's National Coalition , the Syrian opposition, the Elyse Palace.

In Britain , Prime Minister Cameron Davis proved to be a hasty soda head and faced a revolt against war plans among their own conservative. And the Labour Party, in opposition , made ​​clear requirements to support him . Cameron would have through a resolution on Syria in Parliament yesterday, Thursday. However, to accommodate the critics he had to promise to come back again when UN weapons inspectors has submitted its report on chemical weapons in Syria. Then would be the second ballot . But Thursday night he lost anyway with 285 against and 272 votes out in the back, a stinging defeat for the United States' most ardent supporter .

In the U.S., Barack Obama said that " the decision is not yet taken ." He says to have clear evidence of the use of chemical weapons by the Syrian government forces' side. But he has not yet presented any irrefutable evidence that can convince doubters and win support for a military attack .

Neither Obama or Cameron finds some support among voters to attack Syria. For Hollande is it any better , but voters are divided .

The Security Council is the no way, because of the "friends" of Syria's president, Bashar al - Assad , in Russia and China, which each have their reasons to support him . The British draft resolution , which would give the authority to use "all necessary means " to " protect civilians against chemical weapons" , was a Russian veto until it lay on the table. And now not even support the proposal in the Parliament of Great Britain.

But, as Hans Blix , former head of weapons inspectors in Iraq , said : You could probably get by Russia , China and Iran also a condemnation of the use of chemical weapons in Syria , where they waited for the report of the UN weapons inspectors in Syria and if the report provide a clear answer .

UN Secretary General Ban Ki -moon , says one has to wait for the report before the Security Council can do nothing decision . Inspectors are done in Syria Saturday. Then they write a report . First up next week to brighten the image . Does soda heads patience to wait? After the defeat in Britain they must at least think carefully .

But to bypass the UN Security Council that is , they must be able to present irrefutable evidence and compelling reasons for the sensible go to military attack . Memories of the war in Iraq , which was justified by false evidence about weapons of mass destruction, putting pressure on those who now want to attack Syria , and the story is not forgotten by opponents either.

A broad coalition has not been collected to intervene in Syria. The Arab League condemns albeit clearly the Syrian regime's use of chemical weapons. But neither country goes public with support for a military attack . And participate they will not at all.

Obama, Cameron and Hollande stumbles on a war footing .

(So let's ask this question, Obama why do you have to stick your nose into other countries all the time? And make an excuse just to "let yourself in", gas, chemical attack.. you are the one ordering the attacks so shut up, the world don't need you! What was his excuse when he declared war against libya, Iraq etc? The same bullshitt, that the government is hurting their people, oil, gas attack etc. it's plain bullshitt!)

No right to speak?


Short update, more will come later.
The reason I haven't been writing anything lately is because im researching, yes i don't post stuff that is false, fake or whatever. I post documentaries, facts about what i have been researching, thinking on, what makes sense, and so on.
I found a interessting clip, I would like you to watch it and think about what you have seen.

Why is there 30+ police men there? Have he done something wrong? Oh yeah, he doesn't shut up, that's why.

"What is happening in Hollywood that a guy will be on a street waving a gun screaming, they are trying to kill me!"


Next stand-up comedian i would like to write about is Dave Chapelle.

Chapelle was born August 24, 1973 (hes 39 years old).
He was born in Washington D.C

Prehistory :

Chappelle grew up in Silver spring, Marylandand attendedWoodlin Elementary School.During young Chappelle's formative years, his comic inspiration came from various comedians, particularly Eddie MurphyandRichard Pryor.

After his parents separated, Chappelle stayed in Washington with his mother while spending summers with his father in Ohio. In 1991, he graduated from Washington's Duke Ellington School of the Arts where he studied theatre arts.

Chappelle moved to New York City to pursue a career as a comedian. He gathered the courage to perform at

Harlem's famed Apollo Theater in front of the infamous "Amateur Night" audience. The performance resulted in

him being booed off the stage. Chappelle has described the experience as the moment that gave him the courage

to continue his show business aspirations. He quickly made a name for himself on the New York comedy circuit,

even performing in the city's parks.

In 2003, Chappelle debuted his own weekly sketch comedy show on Comedy Central called Chappelle's Show.

The show parodied many aspects of American culture including racial stereotypes, politics and pop culture. Along

with comedy skits, the show also featured musical performances by mostly hip-hop and soul artists.

Due to the show's popularity, Comedy Central's parent company Viacom reportedly offered Chappelle a $55

million contract (giving Chappelle a share of DVD sales) to continue production of Chappelle's Show for two more

years while allowing him to do side projects. Chappelle had stated that sketches are not his favorite form of

comedy, and that the characteristics of the show's format were somewhat like short films.

In a June 2004 stand-up performance in Sacramento, California, Chappelle walked off the stage after berating his

audience for constantly shouting "I'm Rick James, bitch!," which became a catchphrase from the popular "Rick

James" sketch. After a few minutes, Chappelle returned and continued by saying, "The show is ruining my life." He

stated that he disliked working "20 hours a day" and that the popularity of the show was making it difficult for him to

continue his stand-up career, which was "the most important thing" to him.

He also told the audience:

You know why my show is good? Because the network officials say you're not smart enough to get what I'm doing,and every day I fight for you. I tell them how smart you are. Turns out, I was wrong. You people are stupid.

(what does he mean with that? I bet most of the people takes this as an insult, that's how most people are nowadays, it's not about thinking about the message but to get angry and don't think/do something about it instead.)

Season 3 was scheduled to air on May 31, 2005, but in that month, Chappelle stunned fans and the entertainment

industry when he abruptly left during production of the third season of Chappelle's Show and took a trip to South

Africa. Chappelle has since stated that he was unhappy with the direction the show had taken.

Coming here I don't have the distractions of fame. It quiets the ego down. I'm interested in the kind of person I've

got to become. I want to be well rounded and the industry is a place of extremes. I want to be well balanced. I've

got to check my intentions, man.

He was interviewed for Inside the Actors Studio on December 18, 2005 at Pace University's Michael Schimmel

Center for the Arts. The show premiered on February 12, 2006. Chappelle stated that the death of his father in

1998 had an impact on his decision to go to South Africa. By throwing himself into his work, he had not taken a

chance to mourn his father's death. He also said the rumors that he was in drug or psychiatric treatment only

persuaded him to stay in South Africa.

He continued:

I would go to work on the show and I felt awful every day, that's not the way it was. ... I felt like some kind of prostitute or something. If I feel so bad, why keep on showing up to this place? I'm going to Africa. The hardest thing to do is to be true to yourself, especially when everybody is watching.

After he came back from africa, the first thing he did was to be on the show called Oprah.
If you would like to check it out, just go on youtube and search on david chappelle oprah, something like that.

Let me remind you, those words he says is made up so it sound funny, but it is actually true.
Like when he told about when he got a phone call from Obama. You should check that out too.



Norsk :

Til n har alle innleggene vrt p norsk, jeg vil spre ord internasjonalt, s fra n av blir alle innleggene p engelsk,
slik at alle kan lese bloggen. Noen innlegg kommer ogs til vre p bde engelsk og norsk.

M jeg ogs f fortelle at det inneholder informasjon og filmer som ikke br bli sett av mennesker under 15 r, dere leser og ser p eget ansvar og vilje, jeg sprer bare budskap og det er dere som skal tenke videre, jeg kan ikke/skal ikke fortelle hvordan dere skal fle eller mene om diverse saker, det er dere som m finne ut av resten selv.

Jeg hper at det er flere som kommenterer hva de synes og mener, slik at man kan diskutere saker uten henge ut hverandre, slenge stygge kommentarer osv. Hvis det er kommentarer som inneholder trakkasering mot enten meg, eller andre som kommenterer s vil kommentaren bli slettet, (vi burde forsttt til n, at vi skal vre snille mot med mennesker.)

English :

Until now, all the posts have been in Norwegian, I will spread the word internationally, so from now on all the entries will be in English,so that everyone can read my blog. Some posts will also be in both English and Norwegian.

I must also tell you that it contains information and videos that should not be seen by people under 15 years , you are reading and looking at your own risk and will, I just spread the message and it is you who will think further, I can not / will not tell how you are going to feel or think about various matters, it is you who must figure out the rest yourself.

I hope that there will be more comments about what they think and feel, so we can discuss issues without having to hang out eachother, throwing nasty comments etc. If there are comments that contain harassment against either me or others who comment, the comment will be deleted (we should have understood until now, that we should be kind to the people.)

I like to do a moron thing...It's called THINKING!


N skal jeg skrive om noen stand-up komikere, tre spessielle stand-up komikere, de er godt kjent i Amerika, men er alt det som blir sagt av komikerne for spre latter og glede eller er det kanskje en tanke bak "humoren". Sprer de budskap mens de holder show?

Jeg vil spessielt nevne tre menn, alle driver/drev med stand up. Dere har nok hrt om hvertfall en av dem

1. George Carlin (Mai 12, 1937? Juni 22, 2008)
2. Dave Chapellle(August 24, 1973)
3. Katt Wiliams (September 2, 1973)

Jeg la nettop merke til hvor like tall fdseldatoene var, om det er noen tilfeldighet vet jeg ikke.

George Carlin :

George Carlin var en god talsmann. Han talte ut sannheten og intet annet enn sannheten.
Selv om talsmenn som George kommer og gr inn i denne verden, prver gi oss en wake up call og vre i stand til forandre vr verden og leve p riktig mte .. alt vi gjr er hre og glemme, i stedet for hre og handle.
Alle er gode nr de snakker eller lytter, men de er ikke s gode hvis de ikke setter sin tale og informasjon de fikk, i aksjon ...
Hvis du mener at du blir kontrollert som George sier det, istedenfor klappe, le av det og si: "wow han er helt rett" ... s gjr noe, handle! Ta kontroll!

Ta dere tiden til hre p dette klippet, det er et klipp med diverse show(de viktigste) som dere br hre.

Informasjon om de to andre komikerne kommer i senere innlegg.
Grunnen til dette er at jeg ikke kan skrive hjemme, fra mobil eller noe, jeg skriver kun et sted med en bestemt ip adresse. Grunnen til dette er for at identiteten min skal vre ukjent, jeg vil ikke bli sporet opp, jeg vil ikke at noen skal vite hvem jeg er eller noen annen informasjon.

Fordi informasjonen jeg slipper ut her, ja det er allerede mange som vet om det, men big brother osv. vil ikke at alle mennesker skal begynne bruke hodet, s derfor snne mennesker som meg blir oftest "borte".

Hvis denne bloggen noen gang kommer p topp 100 eller topp 3, s kan det hende at denne bloggen vil bli sperret, lukket pga. innholdet.

We are Anonymous. We are Legion. We do not forgive. We do not forget. Expect us


En gjeng med hackere, en gjeng med lovbrytere, en gjeng som br bli straffet og satt inn i fengsel?
Her har vi media igjen, media utrykker at anonymous er cyber terrorrister, de skaper alt annet en fred.

De har blitt kalt s mange forskjellige ting, det morsomte er at det ikke er mange som vet mye informasjon om dem, det er tross alt en grunn til at de kalles Anonymous(Anonym).
S hva skal vi tro p da, at det er en gjeng med tennringer som hacker og bringer ned nettsider eller gjr de det fordi de har en grunn til det?

Ja gruppen begr lovbrudd, det er flere lover som brytes nr de hacker eller som jeg liker si ; sloss for oss mennesker!
Husk at vi mennesker er redde, vi er redd for sloss, vi vil gjerne at mye skal vre annerledes, men trr ikke gjre noe med det, hvem skal da st opp og faktisk gjre noe?
Siden vi er s redde for se ut som en psykopat, redd for si vre meninger, havne i fengsel..s velger vi ikke gjre noe med det, men vi diskuterer gjerne om det.

Tror du at en gruppe med mennesker risikerer "friheten" sin, livene sine p prve forandre verden og hverdagen vr, hadde du gjort det?
Big brother er livredde for hva eller hvor Anonymous slr til neste gang, men hvis Anonymous er s slemme, har dere noen gang hrt eller sett at de har feks. hacket nettsiden til de som jobber mot dyreplageri, bekjempelse mot pels eller noe slikt? Nei, de hacker kun bedrifter, mennesker som jobber imot mennesker.


1. Beginning in January 2008, Anonymous kicked off "Project Chanology," its attack on the Church of Scientology, a cult-like religion which allegedly imprisons its dissident members. They launched denial of service attacks against the organization's websites, gamed the link-sharing site Digg to more prominently display anti-Scientology pages, and even physically protested ? showing up in person ? many church events.

2.Anonymous released user information from a major hacking forum in February 2011, and security firm Mandiant was able to use this data to link the Chinese military to cyber-attacks against the U.S. this year.

3. The Westboro Baptist Church is notoriously hateful and intolerant. Anonymous successfully took down the Westboro Baptist Church's website in February 2011 in protest.

4. Operation DarkNet was the group's campaign against child pornography in October 2011. Because pornographers were incredibly effective at using technology to hide themselves, Anonymous used technology to put them out of business.

5.The Steubenville rape case ? in which images of the high school victim were disseminated in social media ? obviously got a lot of attention earlier this year. Anonymous released incriminating video, tweets, and emails belonging to accused players on the school's football team.
6.Just this month, Anonymous began "Operation Free Korea." It's the group's effort to get "controversial leader Kim Jong-un to resign," "install free democracy," "abandon nuclear ambition," and grant "uncensored internet access" to its citizens. On April 3, Anonymous released all 15,000 usernames and passwords for the government's web services and threatened to wipe its data.

Men hva er faktisk Anonymous?
Anonymous er ofte beskrevet som et "hacker kollektiv", en gruppe individer som hacker for et lignende forml. Men Anonymous er egentlig en gruppe bare i den forstand at flere personer bruker navnet til overskriften deres innsats. Anonymous bestr av personer som hacker i datasystemer uten tillatelse og tar data som kommunikasjon poster, navn, adresser, telefonnumre, og kredittkort. Anonyme medlemmer generelt, har "strre gode" forml bak sine angrep. For eksempel, i september, angrepet medlemmer Texas politiets datasystemer og publiserte 3GB av politi logger, der det begrunnes med at det ville skinne et lys p politiets korrupsjon. Anonymous har ogs hacket inn i San Francisco BART kollektivtransport-systemet og gjort brede trusler mot Facebook.
Hacking angrep fra Anonymous er generelt organisert av et lite antall personer og som ordet gr fra medlem til medlem, andre hopper om bord.
Hvor legger Anonymous ut informasjon?
Ved hjelp av ulike Twitter-kontoer, inkludert @ AnonymousIRC og @ YourAnonNews, og nettstedet Pastebin har Anonymous publisert navn, kredittkortnummer, og krypterte passord informasjon. Ingen av hva som har blitt lagt ut s langt truer bedrifter eller offentlige etater, men det betyr ikke at andre typer sensitive data vil ikke bli lagt i nr fremtid.
Dokumentar om Anonymous

We are Anonymous. We are Legion. We do not forgive. We do not forget. Expect us

Fri murere i Norge - Dokumentar


I sold my soul to the devil


Eminem, har vi sett noen endringer de siste rene?
Utseende, teksten i sangene hans?

Husker dere for noen r siden, hvilken hrfarge hadde han, hvordan gikk sangene hans?
Han var blond og sang sanger som alltid inneholt, nakenhet, damer og generelt TULL!
M sangere dra frem nakene damer, penger, dop, og bla. sette ut andre artister?

Vil du at barna dine skal se slikt p tv? Det er veldig nrt pornografi, ikke? Har du sett Candy shop med 50 cent?
Eller My band med d12(eminem var en av personene i gruppen).

N skal jeg skrive inn noen lyrics til sangene til Eminem, hvordan det gikk fra de "random bullshitt" sangene hans til en mer seris tone og tekst, du kan hre mye om hans liv i tekstene hans, han beskriver mye men mye er ogs "gjemt".

Jeg skal ikke dra frem tekster fra alle albummene hans, jeg skal bare dra frem tekster som jeg syns han beskriver ganske mye av hva som skjer. Jeg skal ogs skrive hvilket album, rstall, s kan dere ogs sjekke hele lyricsen selv, eventuelt musikkvideoen.

Album: Slim shady ep (1998)
Sang tittel: Murder murder

All I see is murder murder, my mind state -[2Pac]
Makes it too late for cops in tryin' to stop the crime rate -[Swift]
All I see is murder murder, my mind state
Murder, murder, murder, and kill, kill, kill!

See I'm a nice man but money turned me to Satan
I'm thirsty for this green so bad I'm dehydratin'

But I ain't set to flee the scene of the crime just yet
Cuz I got a daughter to feed
And $200 ain't enough to water the seed
The best thing would be for me to leave Taco Bell an' hit up Chess King

Album: Slim shady(1999)
Sangtittel: My name is

Hi kids! Do you like violence? (Yeah yeah yeah!)
Wanna see me stick Nine Inch Nails through each one of my eyelids? (Uh-huh!)
Wanna copy me and do exactly like I did? (Yeah yeah!)
Try 'cid and get fucked up worse that my life is? (Huh?)

My brain's dead weight, I'm trying to get my head straight

Sangtittel: If i had

What is life?
Life is like a big obstacle
put in front of your optical to slow you down
And everytime you think you gotten past it
it's gonna come back around and tackle you to the damn ground
What are friends?
Friends are people that you think are your friends
But they really your enemies, with secret indentities
and disguises, to hide they true colors
So just when you think you close enough to be brothers
they wanna come back and cut your throat when you ain't lookin
What is money?
Money is what makes a man act funny
Money is the root of all evil
Money'll make them same friends come back around
swearing that they was always down

Album: Recovery(2010)
Sangtittel: Not afraid

I'm not afraid (I'm not afraid)
To take a stand (to take a stand)
Everybody (everybody)
Come take my hand (come take my hand)
We'll walk this road together, through the storm
Whatever weather, cold or warm
Then you know that, you're not alone

Holla if you feel like you've been down the same road (same road)

En til sang, men denne skriver jeg ikke ned, den m hres.
Sangtittel: My darling

Hvilke andre artister vet vi om som "plutselig" har ddd?

John lennon : "Our society is run by insane people for insane objectives. I think we're being run by maniacs for maniacal ends and I think I'm liable to be put away as insane for expressing that. That's what's insane about it."

Prinsesse Diana : "I like to be a free spirit. Some don't like that, but that's the way I am."

2pac shakur : "Killuminati."

Michael Jackson : "The minute it became the all-time best-selling album in the history of the Guinness Book of World Records, overnight they called me a freak. They called me a homosexual. They called me a child molester. They said I bleached my skin. They made everything to turn the public against me."

Martin Luther king.

Marelyn Monroe.

Malcom X.

Aaliyah Haughton.

Robert F. Kennedy.

Bob Marley.

Abraham Lincoln

(og mange andre...listen med mennesker kunne fylt en bok.)

Selvflgelig s er det en likhet med alle ddsfallene, og vi tror jo selvsagt p det.
Om det er rusmissbruk, blitt drept av en ukjent som ikke likte hva han hrte, eller kanskje selvmord?

En kjendis som dde ganske nylig, husker dere hvem de var?
Whitney Houston og Amy winehouse, hvordan dde de? Overdose... og hvordan kan vi da ikke tro p hva media skriver, vi har jo sett bilder av amy, der hvor hun ser skikkelig sliten ut av all dop missbruket, vanskelig og tro at det faktisk er noe annet som har skjedd eller hva?

Men hva om det er det som er meningen, at alt er planlagt, planlagt alt slik at det skal vre s naturlig som mulig og at det ikke vil vekke noen oppmerksomhet. For vi menensker missliker andre som er avhengige av diverse rus middler, gjr vi ikke? Vi vil ikke nerme oss de skittne narkomanene som bare fortjener d fordi de valgte det selv, er det ikke slik vi tenker? S nr et menneske dr av overdose, s tenker vi bare at det var fortjent og ikke tenker mer p det. Virkelig fantastisk verden vi bor i, er det ikke slik at vi skal tenke p andre mennesker, hjelpe andre mennesker uansett hvilken bakrunn, historie de har? Ikke dm et menneske p forhnd og lag dine egne stygge tanker om en person du ikke kjenner, det er FEIL!

Hjelp en person hver dag, spre glede og hvertfall Norge skal bli et bedre sted leve, vi m st sammen uansett hva, vi avgjr hvordan livene vres skal vre, hva barna vres skal vokse opp med, vi avgjr om det skal vre hat som spres eller glede, det trenger ikke vre noe stort, men kun ved holde dren for en ukjent person betyr kjempe mye, START FORANDRINGEN!

Ville du ofret barna dine for sannheten?


Jeg skal ta opp en del saker, saker som trenger mer etterforsking, saker som har har noe mer sjule.

Vet dere hvem president John F. Kennedy er?
Her er litt for info om ham:

Kennedy ble fdt Mai 29. 1917 og ble drept November 22, 1963, Kennedy var 46 r da han dde.

Han er mest kjent som Usa's 35. president, og betydningsfulle hendelser i hans presidentperiode var blant annet invasjonen i Grisebukten, utplassering av rakketer mot Cuba, byggingen av Berlinmuren, romkapplpet, den afroamerikanskeborgerretssbevegelsen, og begynnelsen p Vietnamkrigen

Han var gift med JaquelineKennedy, og de hadde to barn sammen som vokste opp. Det rystet verden da president Kennedy ble drept i et attentat iDallasiTexasden22.november 1963noe som ogs har bidratt til hans kultstatus i ettertid.Lee HarveyOswaldble anklaget for mordet, men ble selv skutt og drept to dager senere avJack rubyfr han kunne bli stilt for rettssak.FBIog Warrenkomisjonenkonkluderte med at Oswald var den eneste som hadde deltatt i mordet. I dag har Kennedy fortsatt en hy status i den offentlige meningen som rangerer presidentene i USA.

Sprsml underveis :

Hvorfor, eller hva var motivet til Oswald for drepe Kennedy?
Hvorfor ble Oswald drept fr det hadde blitt noen rettsak? Er det fordi at Oswald ikke skulle kunne forklart seg selv for retten og for alle menneskene i Usa? Hva er det de sjuler, og hvorfor har det ikke blitt noen strre etterforskning av dette?

Er det i det heletatt Oswald skyldig?

Et lett regn falt p fredag ​​morgen, 22. november, men en folkemengde p flere tusen sto p parkeringsplassen utenfor Texas Hotel der Kennedy hadde tilbrakt natten. En plattformen ble satt opp og presidenten, ifrt ingen beskyttelse mot vret, kom ut for gjre noen korte bemerkninger :

Talen kan bli lest her :http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/americanexperience/features/primary-resources/jfk-trademart/

Vpenet som ble brukt:

6.5 x 52 mm Italian Carcano M91/38 bolt-action rifle, serial number C2766. The rifle was equipped with a 4x Hollywood brand scope. The military surplus rifle and scope were sold through Klein's Sporting Goods Company by mail order.

Attentaet(politisk motivert drapsforsk)mot president Kennedy22.Novemberer psttt vre resultatet av en konspirasjon i mange forskjellige teorier. Disse teoriene avviser Warrenkommisjonenskonklusjon om n morderog hevder det var umulig at n mann kunne ha skutt tre skudd p 4,5?7 sekunder med en rifle fra andre verdenskrig, hvor 1 kule bommet og 2 kuler traff president Kennedy og Texas guvernrJohnConally. Forskjellige teorier involverer blant annet at CIAog FBI, mafiaen, frimurere, kommunisterog amerikanske ledere planla og utfrte attentatet p presidenten. Enkelte av teoriene hevder at flere enn tre skudd ble fyrt av, og at det var flere enn n skytter. Det hevdes at en kule umuligkan ha klart gjre den skaden offisielle rapporter stadfester. Mest kjente er teoriene presentert i filmenJFKav Oliver Stonefra 1991. Filmen handler om Jim Garrisonsom var den frste som tok saken til retten og beskyldte forretningsmannen Clay Shawfor vre involvert og at amerikanske myndigheter sto bak attentatet. Som flge av filmen ble hundrevis av dokumenter offentliggjort, og attentatet kom igjen i et skarpt skelys.

Jesse Ventura er en mann som gr inn i konspirasjons teorier, finner info, finner mennesker som har info ect.
Han har ogs laget en dokumentar ang. Kennedy saken.

NB! Video klipp av drapet p Kennedy
Se p eget ansvar.



Hvor mange skyte masakre har det vrt og hvor mange "terror" angrep har vi hatt de siste rene?
Hva tenker dere om disse hendelsene? Synd og huff?

Det dere har hrt p tv, radio osv. tror du den informasjonen er fakta? Hvordan vet vi om dette er fakta?
Man m nesten begynne gjre litt researsh selv, finne informasjon, tenke nye gjennom og stille sprsml.

La oss ta opp et stort tema, 9/11 terror angrepet, hva tror du skjedde? Tror du at alqaida styrtet to passasjer fly inn i twin towers?
Det er det de vil at vi skal tro, hva om jeg sier at det var selveste Bush som bestilte det angrepet mot sitt eget land, hva om jeg sier at det er mennesker som faktisk s diverse saker som ikke gir mening, og hvorfor ble de menneskene "plutselig" borte? Hva om jeg sier at Al qaida jobber for Amerika, de fr betalt for ta ansvaret for angrep som amerika bestiller.

De menneskene hadde informasjon om denne terror handlingen som kunne avslre hva som faktisk hadde skjedd.

Hva er poenget med dette, er det fordi vi skal misslike eller hate generelt muslime/utlandske mennesker? Det samme skjedde i Norge 22. Juli, husker dere hva som stod p Twitter den dagen?
Al qaeda skrev at det var dem som hadde ansvaret for hendelsene i Oslo, det var flere utlandske menn som ble banket opp den dagen, ser dere hvor dette gr?
Tilslutt s er det Amerika som str bak al qaeda.

Husk at, s lenge du har litt makt, penger og kan bli lagt merke til, om du prater om noe spesifike emner s kan du rett og slett bli "borte", bli gjort til som om du er gal.
For si det snn, hva om en ukjent person forteller at han har blitt tatt med til verdensrommet av romvesener, og en rekke med vitenskapsmenn osv. sier at det er lgn, hvem tror du da p?
Den ene mannen eller flertallet?
Den ene mannen vil bli sett p som gal og medmennesker mener han br beske psykolog og legges inn p mentalsykehus, er dette riktig, tenk hvordan denne personen har det, du vet selv at du ikke er gal, du vet at det som skjedde har skjedd, men ingen tror deg....